A Comprehensive Comparison Between Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC and IFRS
- Nhung Nguyen
- Jun 28
- 34 min read
Introduction
As Vietnam continues its journey toward international financial reporting convergence, the Ministry of Finance has introduced Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC ("Circular 99") to modernize financial reporting requirements and align Vietnamese accounting practices more closely with global standards. Although Circular 99 represents a significant improvement in financial reporting transparency, it is not equivalent to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
Many Vietnamese companies—particularly listed entities, foreign-invested enterprises (FDIs), multinational subsidiaries, and businesses preparing for overseas fundraising or IPOs—need to understand the differences between Circular 99 and IFRS.
This article provides an in-depth comparison covering:
Objectives
Financial statement presentation
Recognition and measurement
Revenue
Financial instruments
Leases
Fair value
Consolidation
Foreign currency
Disclosures
Transition challenges
Practical implications
1. Overview
Item | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS |
Issuer | Ministry of Finance of Vietnam | International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) |
Scope | Vietnamese enterprises | Global companies |
Purpose | Standardized statutory reporting | Investor-focused financial reporting |
Legal status | Mandatory under Vietnamese regulations | Mandatory or permitted depending on jurisdiction |
Philosophy | Rule-based | Principle-based |
2. Primary Objective
Circular 99
The primary objective is:
Compliance with Vietnamese law
Tax administration
Government supervision
Consistent reporting format
Financial statements primarily support:
Tax authorities
State agencies
Local regulators
IFRS
IFRS aims to provide useful information to:
Investors
Creditors
Analysts
Capital markets
Its emphasis is:
Economic substance
Fair presentation
Decision usefulness
3. Financial Statement Components
Financial Statement | Circular 99 | IFRS |
Statement of Financial Position | Yes | Yes |
Income Statement | Yes | Yes |
Cash Flow Statement | Yes | Yes |
Statement of Changes in Equity | Yes | Yes |
Notes | Yes | Yes |
Although both require similar statements, presentation differs significantly.
4. Presentation Philosophy
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS |
Presentation approach | Financial statement formats are largely prescribed by regulation. | No mandatory financial statement templates are prescribed. |
Flexibility | Limited flexibility in presentation. Companies are expected to follow standardized reporting formats. | High flexibility. Management may present financial statements in the format that best reflects the entity's operations and financial position. |
Basis for presentation | Compliance with statutory reporting requirements. | Presentation is driven by the principles of materiality, relevance, faithful representation, and comparability. |
Management judgment | Minimal discretion in reorganizing line items. | Significant professional judgment is permitted to improve the usefulness of financial information. |
Example | Current assets are typically presented in a prescribed order (e.g., Cash → Receivables → Inventory). | Assets and liabilities may be reorganized or classified differently if doing so provides more relevant and reliable information to users of the financial statements. |
5. Basis of Measurement
Measurement Basis | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS |
Overall measurement approach | Primarily based on the historical cost model, with limited use of alternative measurement bases. | Uses multiple measurement bases depending on the applicable IFRS standard and the nature of the asset or liability. |
Historical Cost | The primary measurement basis for most assets and liabilities. | Commonly used as the initial measurement basis and, in many cases, as a subsequent measurement basis. |
Fair Value | Applied only in limited circumstances prescribed by Vietnamese accounting regulations. | Widely applied under various IFRS standards, including IFRS 9, IFRS 13, IAS 40, IAS 41, and IFRS 3. |
Amortized Cost | Limited application. | Extensively used for financial assets and financial liabilities under IFRS 9 using the effective interest method. |
Present Value | Rarely used as a measurement basis. | Frequently used to measure long-term assets and liabilities, including lease liabilities, provisions, employee benefit obligations, impairment testing, and discounted cash flows. |
Current Value Measurement | Limited application. | May include fair value, value in use, fulfillment value, or current cost depending on the applicable IFRS standard. |
Professional Judgment | Relatively limited due to standardized regulatory guidance. | Significant judgment is required in selecting the appropriate measurement basis and estimating fair values, discount rates, expected cash flows, and other valuation assumptions. |
Disclosure Requirements | Standard disclosures regarding measurement methods. | Extensive disclosures regarding measurement bases, valuation techniques, key assumptions, estimation uncertainty, and fair value hierarchy where applicable. |
Practical Example: Measurement of an Investment Property
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS |
Investment property acquired | Company purchases an office building for long-term rental income. | Same transaction. |
Initial measurement | Recognized at historical cost. | Initially recognized at historical cost. |
Subsequent measurement | Generally continues to be measured using the cost model. | Entity may choose either the Cost Model or the Fair Value Model under IAS 40. |
Changes in market value | Increases or decreases in market value are generally not recognized unless specifically required by regulations. | Under the Fair Value Model, changes in fair value are recognized immediately in Profit or Loss. |
Overall effect | Financial statements remain relatively stable due to the use of historical cost. | Financial statements more closely reflect current market conditions but may exhibit greater volatility due to fair value remeasurement. |
6. Fair Value
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS |
Overall approach | Fair value is applied only in limited circumstances specifically prescribed by regulations. | Fair value is a fundamental measurement basis and is applied extensively across many accounting standards. |
Primary measurement basis | Historical cost remains the predominant measurement basis for most assets and liabilities. | Assets and liabilities may be measured at historical cost, amortized cost, or fair value depending on the applicable IFRS standard. |
Investment Property | Generally carried at historical cost (less accumulated depreciation and impairment, where applicable). | May be measured using either the Fair Value Model or the Cost Model under IAS 40. |
Financial Instruments | Limited use of fair value; most financial assets are measured at historical cost. | Many financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value under IFRS 9 (FVTPL or FVOCI). |
Biological Assets | No comprehensive fair value model. | Measured at fair value less costs to sell under IAS 41, unless an exception applies. |
Business Combinations | Fair value adjustments are limited. | Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are measured at fair value on the acquisition date under IFRS 3. |
Share-based Payments | Very limited guidance on fair value measurement. | Equity-settled share-based payments are measured at the fair value of the equity instruments granted under IFRS 2. |
Fair Value Hierarchy | No formal fair value hierarchy is prescribed. | IFRS 13 establishes a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs other than quoted prices), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs based on valuation techniques). |
Disclosure Requirements | Relatively limited disclosure regarding fair value measurements. | Extensive disclosures are required, including valuation techniques, assumptions, sensitivity analyses, and fair value hierarchy classifications. |
Professional Judgment | Limited reliance on valuation judgments due to historical cost emphasis. | Significant professional judgment is often required to determine fair values, especially for Level 2 and Level 3 measurements. |
7. Revenue Recognition
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IFRS 15) |
Recognition principle | Revenue is generally recognized based on legal documentation and fulfillment of contractual conditions. | Revenue is recognized when control of goods or services is transferred to the customer. |
Primary basis | Invoice issuance, delivery of goods, customer acceptance, and contractual completion. | Economic substance of the transaction and satisfaction of performance obligations. |
Recognition trigger | Often linked to invoicing, delivery, or formal acceptance by the customer. | Triggered when each performance obligation is satisfied, either at a point in time or over time. |
Accounting approach | Relatively straightforward, with limited guidance on complex contracts. | Uses a comprehensive principles-based framework to account for various types of customer contracts. |
Multiple-element contracts | Generally treated as a single contract unless regulations specify otherwise. | Contracts are analyzed to identify separate performance obligations, each accounted for individually. |
Revenue allocation | Limited guidance on allocating consideration among multiple goods or services. | Transaction price must be allocated to each performance obligation based on relative standalone selling prices. |
Revenue over time | Less commonly applied; recognition often occurs upon completion or acceptance. | Revenue is recognized over time if one of the IFRS 15 criteria is met; otherwise, it is recognized at a point in time. |
Professional judgment | Relatively limited. | Significant judgment may be required to determine performance obligations, variable consideration, timing of transfer of control, and standalone selling prices. |
Disclosure requirements | Standard revenue disclosures. | Extensive disclosures on revenue disaggregation, contract balances, remaining performance obligations, significant judgments, and contract assets/liabilities. |
Practical Example: Software License with Technical Support
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IFRS 15) |
Contract | Customer purchases software with one year of technical support. | Same contract. |
Revenue recognition | Revenue is often recognized when the invoice is issued or the software is delivered and accepted by the customer. | The contract is separated into two performance obligations: (1) software license and (2) technical support service. |
Software license | Usually recognized together with the entire contract revenue. | Revenue is recognized when control of the software license transfers to the customer. |
Technical support | Often included in the initial revenue recognition. | Revenue is recognized over the one-year support period as the service is provided. |
Result | Revenue may be recognized earlier, resulting in higher initial revenue. | Revenue is matched more closely with the actual delivery of goods and services, providing a more faithful representation of economic performance. |
8. Financial Instruments
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IFRS 9) |
Overall guidance | Limited guidance on the recognition, classification, and measurement of financial instruments. | Comprehensive accounting framework covering recognition, classification, measurement, impairment, derecognition, and hedge accounting. |
Measurement basis | Primarily historical cost. | Financial instruments are measured at amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI), or fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL), depending on business model and cash flow characteristics. |
Classification of financial assets | Limited classification categories. | Financial assets are classified into three categories: Amortized Cost, FVOCI, and FVTPL. |
Fair value measurement | Applied only in limited situations. | Fair value is widely used for many financial assets and liabilities. |
Impairment model | Loss provisions are generally recognized only when there is objective evidence of impairment (incurred loss model). | Uses the Expected Credit Loss (ECL) model, requiring recognition of expected losses from the date the financial asset is initially recognized. |
Hedge accounting | Very limited or no comprehensive guidance. | Comprehensive hedge accounting framework that better aligns accounting treatment with an entity's risk management activities. |
Derivatives | Limited guidance on accounting for derivative instruments. | Detailed accounting requirements for derivatives, including recognition at fair value and subsequent measurement. |
Embedded derivatives | No comprehensive accounting framework. | Embedded derivatives are assessed and, where required, separated from host contracts and accounted for independently. |
Professional judgment | Relatively limited. | Significant judgment is required in areas such as business model assessment, cash flow characteristics (SPPI test), expected credit losses, and hedge effectiveness. |
Disclosure requirements | Basic financial instrument disclosures. | Extensive disclosures covering credit risk, liquidity risk, market risk, fair value measurements, impairment methodology, and risk management policies. |
Practical Example: Trade Receivables
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IFRS 9) |
Initial recognition | Trade receivables are recognized at the invoiced amount. | Trade receivables are recognized in accordance with IFRS 9 and IFRS 15. |
Impairment approach | A provision is recognized only when there is objective evidence that the customer may not be able to pay (e.g., bankruptcy, significant overdue balances, legal disputes). | An Expected Credit Loss (ECL) allowance is recognized immediately upon initial recognition, even if no default event has occurred. |
Timing of loss recognition | Losses are recognized after impairment indicators arise (incurred loss model). | Expected losses are recognized from Day 1, resulting in earlier recognition of potential credit losses. |
Financial statement impact | Higher receivable balances and lower impairment expense in the early stages of a receivable's life. | Lower net receivable balances and earlier recognition of impairment expense, providing a more forward-looking assessment of credit risk. |
Objective | Reflect realized or observable losses. | Reflect expected future credit losses and improve the timeliness of loss recognition. |
9. Lease Accounting
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IFRS 16) |
Lease classification | Leases are generally classified as Operating Leases or Finance Leases. | For lessees, nearly all leases are recognized on the balance sheet, with limited exceptions (e.g., short-term leases and low-value assets). |
Accounting model | Different accounting treatments apply depending on lease classification. | A single lessee accounting model is applied to most leases. |
Operating leases | Lease payments are recognized as Rent Expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. | Operating lease accounting is largely eliminated for lessees. Lease payments are replaced by depreciation and interest expense. |
Finance leases | Recognized as leased assets and lease liabilities, with depreciation and finance costs recognized over the lease term. | Similar concept, but applied to nearly all leases under the right-of-use model. |
Balance sheet impact | Operating leases generally remain off the balance sheet. | Most leases result in recognition of both a Right-of-Use (ROU) Asset and a Lease Liability on the balance sheet. |
Income statement impact | Operating lease payments are recognized as a single rental expense. | Lease costs are split into Depreciation Expense (ROU Asset) and Interest Expense (Lease Liability). |
Cash flow statement impact | Lease payments are generally presented as operating cash outflows. | Principal repayments are generally classified as financing activities, while interest payments are classified according to the applicable accounting policy under IAS 7. |
EBITDA impact | Operating lease expense reduces EBITDA. | EBITDA generally increases because rent expense is replaced by depreciation and interest, which are excluded from EBITDA. |
Financial ratios | Lower reported assets and liabilities; lower leverage ratios. | Higher reported assets and liabilities, increasing leverage while often improving EBITDA and operating profit. |
Disclosure requirements | Basic lease disclosures. | Extensive disclosures regarding lease terms, maturity analysis, variable lease payments, extension options, discount rates, and right-of-use assets. |
Practical Example: Five-Year Office Lease
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IFRS 16) |
Lease arrangement | Company signs a five-year office lease. | Same lease arrangement. |
Initial recognition | No asset or liability is recognized if classified as an operating lease. | Recognize a Right-of-Use (ROU) Asset and a corresponding Lease Liability at the commencement date. |
Subsequent accounting | Monthly lease payments are recognized as Rent Expense. | The ROU Asset is depreciated, while the Lease Liability accrues interest and is reduced as lease payments are made. |
Balance sheet impact | Minimal impact for operating leases. | Both assets and liabilities increase throughout the lease term. |
Income statement impact | A single, straight-line rent expense is recognized each period. | Lease expense consists of Depreciation Expense and Interest Expense, resulting in a higher total expense in the early years of the lease (front-loaded expense pattern). |
Overall effect | Simpler accounting with fewer balance sheet impacts. | Provides a more complete representation of the company's lease obligations and the economic resources controlled through leasing. |
10. Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE)
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 16) |
Initial measurement | Property, plant, and equipment (PPE) are initially recognized at historical cost. | PPE is initially recognized at historical cost, including purchase price and directly attributable costs. |
Subsequent measurement | Generally continues to be measured using the cost model. | Entities may choose either the Cost Model or the Revaluation Model for each class of PPE. |
Historical cost model | Primary measurement basis for all PPE. | Permitted and commonly used. |
Revaluation model | Generally not permitted except where specifically required by regulations. | Permitted under IAS 16, provided that fair value can be measured reliably and revaluations are performed regularly. |
Component accounting | Component accounting is rarely applied. Major assets are typically depreciated as a single unit. | Significant components with different useful lives must be identified and depreciated separately. |
Depreciation method | Depreciation is generally calculated for the entire asset based on its overall useful life. | Each significant component is depreciated over its own estimated useful life. |
Major inspections and overhauls | Major inspection costs are usually recognized as expenses when incurred. | Costs of major inspections are capitalized if the recognition criteria are met and depreciated until the next scheduled inspection. |
Replacement of components | Replacement costs are often treated as repair or maintenance expenses unless regulations permit capitalization. | Replacement of significant components is capitalized, while the carrying amount of the replaced component is derecognized. |
Professional judgment | Limited judgment due to standardized accounting guidance. | Significant judgment is required in identifying components, estimating useful lives, residual values, and determining fair value under the revaluation model. |
Disclosure requirements | Standard disclosures regarding cost, accumulated depreciation, and carrying amounts. | Extensive disclosures including depreciation methods, useful lives, reconciliation of carrying amounts, revaluation information, restrictions on title, and contractual commitments. |
Practical Example: Aircraft Accounting
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 16) |
Asset acquired | Company purchases an aircraft. | Same transaction. |
Asset structure | The aircraft is generally treated as a single asset. | The aircraft is divided into significant components such as Engine, Fuselage (Body), Landing Gear, and Cabin Interior, if they have different useful lives. |
Depreciation | One depreciation schedule is applied to the entire aircraft. | Each component is depreciated separately based on its individual useful life. |
Engine replacement | Replacement costs may be recognized as repair expenses or capitalized depending on local guidance. | The cost of the new engine is capitalized, and the carrying amount of the old engine is derecognized. |
Major inspection | Heavy maintenance or major inspections are generally expensed when incurred. | Major inspection costs are capitalized and depreciated over the period until the next inspection. |
Financial statement impact | Simpler accounting but may not accurately reflect the consumption of different aircraft components. | More accurate allocation of depreciation and asset values, resulting in financial statements that better reflect the economic consumption of the aircraft's significant components. |
11. Impairment
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 36) |
Overall approach | Impairment is primarily based on observable evidence of loss or impairment indicators. | Uses a comprehensive impairment model based on whether an asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. |
Recognition principle | Losses are generally recognized after impairment indicators become evident. | An impairment loss is recognized whenever the carrying amount of an asset or Cash-Generating Unit (CGU) exceeds its recoverable amount. |
Impairment trigger | Observable events such as physical damage, significant decline in value, or other evidence of impairment. | Both external and internal indicators of impairment must be assessed at each reporting date. Certain assets require annual impairment testing regardless of indicators. |
Annual impairment testing | Generally not required unless impairment indicators exist. | Mandatory annual impairment testing for Goodwill and Intangible Assets with Indefinite Useful Lives, even if no impairment indicators are present. |
Recoverable amount | No comprehensive framework for determining recoverable amount. | Recoverable amount is the higher of: • Fair Value Less Costs of Disposal (FVLCD) • Value in Use (VIU). |
Value in Use (VIU) | Limited guidance. | Calculated as the present value of estimated future cash flows expected to be generated from the asset or Cash-Generating Unit (CGU). |
Cash-Generating Unit (CGU) | Limited or no specific guidance. | Assets are tested individually unless they do not generate independent cash flows, in which case impairment is assessed at the CGU level. |
Goodwill | Limited impairment guidance. | Goodwill is not amortized but must be tested annually for impairment. |
Reversal of impairment | Limited guidance. | Impairment losses may be reversed when circumstances improve, except for goodwill, whose impairment losses cannot be reversed. |
Professional judgment | Relatively limited. | Significant judgment is required in estimating future cash flows, discount rates, growth assumptions, and identifying CGUs. |
Disclosure requirements | Standard impairment disclosures. | Extensive disclosures regarding assumptions, discount rates, CGUs, impairment losses, reversals, and sensitivity analyses. |
Practical Example: Goodwill Impairment
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 36) |
Business acquisition | Company acquires another business and recognizes goodwill (where applicable). | Same transaction. |
Annual testing | Generally no mandatory annual impairment test unless impairment indicators exist. | Goodwill must be tested at least annually, regardless of whether impairment indicators exist. |
Recoverable amount assessment | Limited guidance on valuation methodology. | Recoverable amount is determined as the higher of Fair Value Less Costs of Disposal (FVLCD) and Value in Use (VIU). |
Impairment recognition | Losses are recognized when observable impairment evidence exists. | If the recoverable amount is lower than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized immediately in profit or loss. |
Reversal | Limited guidance. | Impairment losses recognized on goodwill cannot be reversed, even if the business subsequently recovers. |
Overall effect | Simpler impairment assessment with fewer valuation requirements. | More robust and forward-looking impairment testing that better reflects the recoverable value of assets and business acquisitions. |
12. Inventory
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 2) |
Measurement basis | Inventory is generally measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value (NRV), with cost being the primary measurement basis. | Inventory is measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value (NRV). |
Cost formulas permitted | Permits commonly accepted cost formulas in accordance with Vietnamese accounting regulations (e.g., FIFO and Weighted Average). | Permits FIFO and Weighted Average Cost methods. |
LIFO method | Not permitted under Circular 99. | Prohibited under IAS 2. |
Net Realizable Value (NRV) | NRV is assessed when there is evidence that inventory may be obsolete, damaged, or selling below cost. | Requires inventory to be written down whenever NRV falls below cost, with detailed guidance on estimating selling price and completion costs. |
Inventory write-downs | Write-downs are recognized when required under Vietnamese accounting regulations. | Inventory is written down to NRV immediately when cost exceeds NRV. |
Reversal of write-downs | Reversals are permitted when the reasons for the write-down no longer exist, subject to applicable regulations. | Previous inventory write-downs must be reversed (up to the amount of the original write-down) when NRV subsequently increases. |
Cost components | Includes purchase costs, conversion costs, and other directly attributable costs. | Includes purchase costs, conversion costs, and other costs incurred to bring inventory to its present location and condition. |
Professional judgment | Limited judgment due to more prescriptive guidance. | Greater judgment is required in estimating NRV, identifying obsolete inventory, and allocating production overheads. |
Disclosure requirements | Standard disclosures regarding inventory balances and valuation methods. | Extensive disclosures, including accounting policies, carrying amounts by inventory category, write-downs, reversals, and inventory recognized as an expense. |
Practical Example: Inventory Valuation
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 2) |
Inventory purchased | Company purchases 1,000 units at USD 100 each. | Same transaction. |
Market conditions | Selling price declines, reducing the estimated NRV to USD 90 per unit. | Same market conditions. |
Valuation | Inventory is written down from cost to NRV if required by accounting regulations. | Inventory must be written down to USD 90 per unit because NRV is lower than cost. |
Subsequent recovery | If market conditions improve, reversal of the write-down may be recognized in accordance with Vietnamese regulations. | If NRV later increases (e.g., to USD 98), the previous write-down is reversed, but only up to the amount of the original write-down. |
Overall effect | Applies the lower of cost and NRV principle with relatively prescriptive guidance. | Applies a more principle-based approach with detailed guidance on NRV estimation and mandatory reversal of write-downs when appropriate. |
13. Borrowing Costs
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 23) |
Overall approach | Borrowing costs may be capitalized when specific conditions prescribed by Vietnamese accounting regulations are met. | Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction, or production of a qualifying asset must be capitalized. |
Recognition principle | Capitalization is permitted under certain circumstances; otherwise, borrowing costs are recognized as finance expenses. | Capitalization is mandatory for borrowing costs directly attributable to qualifying assets; all other borrowing costs are recognized as an expense when incurred. |
Qualifying asset | Recognized based on Vietnamese accounting guidance. | A qualifying asset is an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale (e.g., manufacturing facilities, large construction projects, certain intangible assets). |
Commencement of capitalization | Begins when the conditions specified in local regulations are satisfied. | Capitalization begins when the entity: (1) incurs expenditures for the asset, (2) incurs borrowing costs, and (3) undertakes activities necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale. |
Suspension of capitalization | Governed by Vietnamese accounting guidance. | Capitalization is suspended during extended periods in which active development is interrupted. |
Cessation of capitalization | Ends according to local accounting regulations. | Capitalization ceases when substantially all activities necessary to prepare the qualifying asset for its intended use or sale are complete. |
Specific borrowings | May be capitalized if directly related to qualifying investments or assets. | Actual borrowing costs incurred on specific borrowings are capitalized, less any investment income earned on temporary investment of those borrowings. |
General borrowings | Limited guidance on allocation methods. | Borrowing costs are capitalized using a capitalization rate applied to expenditures on qualifying assets financed by general borrowings. |
Professional judgment | Relatively limited due to more prescriptive guidance. | Significant judgment is required in determining qualifying assets, capitalization periods, capitalization rates, and temporary suspensions. |
Disclosure requirements | Standard disclosures regarding borrowing costs. | Requires disclosure of the amount of borrowing costs capitalized during the period and the capitalization rate used for general borrowings. |
Practical Example: Construction of a Manufacturing Plant
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 23) |
Project | Company constructs a manufacturing plant over a two-year period using bank loans. | Same project. |
Borrowing costs incurred | Interest incurred during construction may be capitalized if the conditions under Circular 99 are satisfied. | Interest directly attributable to constructing the plant must be capitalized as part of the cost of the qualifying asset. |
Construction interruption | Treatment follows Vietnamese accounting regulations. | Capitalization is suspended during any prolonged interruption in active construction. |
Completion of construction | Capitalization ends when permitted under local regulations. | Capitalization stops when the plant is substantially ready for its intended use. |
Financial statement impact | Borrowing costs may increase the carrying amount of the asset if capitalization criteria are met. | Borrowing costs become part of the asset's carrying amount and are subsequently recognized through depreciation over the asset's useful life rather than immediately as finance expense. |
14. Foreign Currency
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 21) |
Overall approach | Foreign currency transactions are accounted for using exchange rates prescribed by Vietnamese regulations. | Foreign currency accounting is based on the concepts of functional currency and presentation currency. |
Exchange rates | Uses official exchange rates in accordance with regulations issued by Vietnamese authorities. | Uses the spot exchange rate at the transaction date and closing exchange rates at the reporting date, depending on the nature of the item. |
Functional currency | Not a fundamental accounting concept. Financial statements are generally prepared in Vietnamese Dong (VND) in accordance with statutory requirements. | Every entity must determine its functional currency, which is the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates. |
Presentation currency | Financial statements are typically presented in the currency prescribed by Vietnamese regulations. | Entities may present financial statements in any presentation currency, which may differ from the functional currency. |
Functional vs. presentation currency | Generally no distinction. | Functional currency and presentation currency may be different, requiring translation procedures under IAS 21. |
Translation of foreign operations | Limited guidance on translating foreign subsidiaries. | Comprehensive requirements for translating foreign operations, including recognition of translation differences in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) until disposal of the foreign operation. |
Exchange differences | Foreign exchange gains and losses are recognized in accordance with Vietnamese accounting regulations. | Exchange differences are generally recognized in profit or loss, except for certain items such as foreign operations and qualifying net investments, where differences may be recognized in OCI. |
Professional judgment | Limited due to prescribed exchange rate rules. | Significant judgment is required in determining the functional currency and assessing changes in the primary economic environment. |
Disclosure requirements | Standard disclosures regarding foreign currency transactions and exchange differences. | Extensive disclosures regarding functional currency, presentation currency, exchange differences, and foreign currency translation methods. |
Practical Example: Foreign-Invested Company
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 21) |
Business operations | A foreign-invested company operates in Vietnam but conducts most of its transactions in USD. | Same business scenario. |
Functional currency determination | Financial reporting generally follows Vietnamese statutory requirements, typically using VND. | The company assesses its primary economic environment and may determine that USD is its functional currency if it primarily generates and spends cash in USD. |
Presentation currency | Financial statements are generally presented in VND in accordance with Vietnamese regulations. | The company may prepare its accounting records in USD (functional currency) and present its financial statements in either USD or VND (presentation currency). |
Translation process | Limited translation requirements beyond statutory reporting rules. | If the presentation currency differs from the functional currency, assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate, income and expenses are translated at transaction or average rates, and translation differences are recognized in OCI. |
Overall effect | Simpler statutory reporting focused on regulatory compliance. | More accurately reflects the economic substance of international operations and improves comparability across multinational groups. |
15. Consolidation
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IFRS 10) |
Overall approach | Consolidation is primarily based on ownership interest and legal ownership structure. | Consolidation is based on the control principle, regardless of legal ownership percentage. |
Primary criterion | Ownership percentage is the key determinant for consolidation. | An investor consolidates an investee when it controls the investee. |
Definition of control | Focuses mainly on majority ownership and statutory requirements. | Control exists when the investor has: (1) power over the investee, (2) exposure or rights to variable returns, and (3) the ability to use its power to affect those returns. |
Voting rights | Majority voting rights generally determine consolidation. | Voting rights are considered, but they are only one factor in assessing control. |
Potential voting rights | Generally not considered in consolidation assessments. | Potential voting rights (e.g., options, convertible instruments) are considered if they are substantive. |
Power over relevant activities | Limited consideration beyond legal ownership. | Assessment focuses on which party has the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the investee's returns. |
Variable returns | Limited emphasis on economic exposure. | The investor must be exposed, or have rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee. |
De facto control | Generally not addressed in detail. | An investor may control an investee even without majority ownership if it has practical ability to direct relevant activities (de facto control). |
Structured entities | Limited guidance. | Specific guidance exists for evaluating control over structured entities where voting rights are not the dominant factor. |
Professional judgment | Relatively limited due to more rules-based guidance. | Significant professional judgment is required to evaluate complex ownership structures, contractual arrangements, and control relationships. |
Disclosure requirements | Standard disclosures regarding subsidiaries and consolidated financial statements. | Extensive disclosures are required regarding subsidiaries, significant judgments in determining control, non-controlling interests, and unconsolidated structured entities (IFRS 12). |
Practical Example: Assessing Control
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IFRS 10) |
Ownership structure | Company A owns 45% of Company B. | Same ownership structure. |
Other shareholders | Consolidation may not be required because Company A does not own more than 50% of the voting shares. | Ownership percentage alone is not determinative. |
Decision-making power | Primary focus remains on legal ownership. | If Company A has the contractual right to direct the relevant activities and the remaining shareholders are widely dispersed and passive, Company A may still control Company B. |
Consolidation conclusion | Company B may not be consolidated. | Company B must be consolidated if Company A meets all three elements of control: power, exposure to variable returns, and the ability to use its power to affect those returns. |
Overall effect | Simpler ownership-based consolidation model. | A more substance-over-form approach that better reflects the true economic relationship between the investor and the investee. |
16. Investments
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS |
Overall approach | Investments are primarily measured using the cost model, with limited use of fair value. | Measurement depends on the nature of the investment and the applicable IFRS standard (e.g., IFRS 9, IAS 28, IFRS 10, IAS 27). |
Initial recognition | Investments are initially recognized at acquisition cost. | Investments are generally initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs (except certain financial assets measured at FVTPL). |
Cost model | The most common measurement basis for many investments. | Permitted in certain circumstances, particularly for separate financial statements under IAS 27 and for some investments not measured under IFRS 9. |
Equity method | Applied for investments in associates and certain long-term investments where significant influence exists, in accordance with Vietnamese accounting regulations. | Required for investments in associates and joint ventures under IAS 28, unless an exemption applies. |
Fair value measurement | Fair value is used only in limited situations prescribed by regulations. | Fair value is widely applied for many financial assets under IFRS 9 (FVTPL or FVOCI). |
Classification of investments | Classification is relatively straightforward and based primarily on the legal form of the investment. | Investments are classified based on the nature of the investment and the applicable IFRS requirements (subsidiary, associate, joint venture, equity investment, debt instrument, etc.). |
Unrealized gains and losses | Generally not recognized unless specifically required by regulations. | Depending on classification, unrealized gains and losses are recognized either in Profit or Loss (FVTPL) or Other Comprehensive Income (FVOCI). |
Impairment | Impairment is recognized when objective evidence of loss exists. | Impairment follows the applicable IFRS model, including the Expected Credit Loss (ECL) model for many financial assets under IFRS 9. |
Professional judgment | Limited due to more rules-based guidance. | Significant judgment is required in determining classification, measurement category, business model, and fair value. |
Disclosure requirements | Standard disclosures regarding investment balances and accounting policies. | Extensive disclosures covering classification, fair values, investment risks, valuation techniques, impairment, and significant judgments. |
Practical Example: Investment in Another Company
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS |
Investment acquired | Company A acquires 30% of the shares of Company B. | Same transaction. |
Significant influence | If significant influence exists, the investment is generally accounted for using the equity method. | IAS 28 requires the equity method because Company A has significant influence over Company B. |
Fair value option | Fair value measurement is generally not available for this investment. | Certain investments that are not associates or joint ventures may instead be measured at FVTPL or FVOCI under IFRS 9, depending on their classification. |
Recognition of investment income | Share of profits is recognized under the applicable accounting regulations when using the equity method. | The investor recognizes its share of the associate's profit or loss and adjusts the carrying amount of the investment accordingly. |
Overall effect | Investment accounting is primarily cost-based with limited use of fair value. | Investment accounting is more comprehensive and reflects the economic substance of the investment through the appropriate measurement model (cost, equity method, amortized cost, FVOCI, or FVTPL). |
17. Business Combinations
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IFRS 3) |
Overall approach | Business combination accounting is relatively simple and primarily follows statutory accounting guidance. | Business combinations are accounted for using the Acquisition Method, providing a comprehensive framework for recognizing and measuring acquired businesses. |
Accounting method | Simplified acquisition accounting with limited guidance on complex transactions. | The Acquisition Method is mandatory for all business combinations within the scope of IFRS 3. |
Identification of acquirer | Generally based on legal ownership and transaction structure. | Requires identifying the accounting acquirer based on which entity obtains control of the acquiree. |
Purchase Price Allocation (PPA) | Limited or simplified allocation of acquisition cost. | Requires a detailed Purchase Price Allocation (PPA), allocating the purchase consideration to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value. |
Measurement of acquired assets and liabilities | Generally recorded based on carrying amounts or limited fair value adjustments. | Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are measured at fair value on the acquisition date. |
Goodwill recognition | Limited guidance on calculating and recognizing goodwill. | Goodwill is recognized as the excess of consideration transferred over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. |
Bargain purchase gain | Limited guidance. | If the fair value of net identifiable assets exceeds the consideration transferred, the resulting bargain purchase gain is recognized immediately in profit or loss after reassessment. |
Contingent consideration | Limited or no comprehensive guidance. | Contingent consideration is recognized at fair value on the acquisition date and subsequently remeasured depending on its classification. |
Acquisition-related costs | Often capitalized as part of the acquisition cost, depending on local regulations. | Acquisition-related costs (e.g., legal, advisory, valuation fees) are expensed as incurred and are not included in the purchase consideration. |
Non-controlling interests (NCI) | Limited guidance. | NCI is recognized at either fair value or the proportionate share of identifiable net assets, depending on the accounting policy elected for each business combination. |
Professional judgment | Relatively limited due to more rules-based guidance. | Significant professional judgment is required in determining fair values, identifying intangible assets, measuring contingent consideration, and allocating purchase price. |
Disclosure requirements | Standard disclosures regarding acquisitions. | Extensive disclosures regarding the acquisition, purchase consideration, fair value measurements, goodwill, acquisition-date assets and liabilities, and the financial impact of the acquisition. |
Practical Example: Acquisition of a Company
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IFRS 3) |
Transaction | Company A acquires 100% of Company B for USD 100 million. | Same transaction. |
Asset measurement | Assets and liabilities are generally recorded using simplified valuation methods with limited fair value adjustments. | All identifiable assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on the acquisition date through a Purchase Price Allocation (PPA). |
Goodwill | Goodwill recognition follows simplified guidance where applicable. | Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. |
Contingent consideration | Future earn-out payments may receive limited accounting treatment. | Earn-out or contingent payments are recognized at fair value on the acquisition date and subsequently remeasured if required. |
Acquisition costs | Legal, consulting, and due diligence costs may be capitalized depending on local accounting requirements. | Acquisition-related costs are recognized immediately as expenses in profit or loss. |
Overall effect | Simpler acquisition accounting with fewer valuation requirements. | Provides a comprehensive and transparent representation of the acquisition by measuring acquired assets and liabilities at fair value and recognizing goodwill and other acquisition-related items separately. |
18. Deferred Tax
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 12) |
Overall approach | Deferred tax guidance is relatively limited and less comprehensive. | Uses a comprehensive temporary difference approach to account for deferred taxes. |
Recognition principle | Deferred tax accounting is applied in accordance with Vietnamese accounting regulations, with a narrower scope than IFRS. | Deferred tax is recognized for nearly all taxable and deductible temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities and their tax bases, subject to limited exceptions. |
Underlying concept | Focuses primarily on compliance with local tax regulations. | Focuses on the future tax consequences of recovering assets and settling liabilities. |
Deferred Tax Assets (DTA) | Recognition is more limited and follows statutory guidance. | Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, unused tax losses, and unused tax credits to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available. |
Deferred Tax Liabilities (DTL) | Limited recognition requirements. | Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for almost all taxable temporary differences, except for specific exemptions under IAS 12. |
Temporary differences | Limited application and guidance. | Temporary differences are the primary basis for calculating deferred taxes. |
Tax loss carryforwards | Recognition depends on local tax regulations. | Deferred tax assets may be recognized for unused tax losses and tax credits when future utilization is probable. |
Initial recognition exemption | Limited guidance. | Certain temporary differences arising from the initial recognition of assets or liabilities may qualify for exemptions under IAS 12. |
Measurement | Measured in accordance with applicable Vietnamese tax regulations. | Measured using enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply when the temporary differences reverse. |
Professional judgment | Relatively limited. | Significant judgment is required in forecasting future taxable profits, assessing recoverability of deferred tax assets, and identifying temporary differences. |
Disclosure requirements | Standard disclosures regarding income tax expense. | Extensive disclosures covering deferred tax assets and liabilities, temporary differences, tax loss carryforwards, effective tax rate reconciliation, and unrecognized deferred tax assets. |
Practical Example: Depreciation Difference
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 12) |
Transaction | A company uses different depreciation methods for accounting and tax purposes. | Same transaction. |
Accounting treatment | Deferred tax treatment follows Vietnamese accounting and tax regulations, with more limited recognition requirements. | The difference between the accounting carrying amount and the tax base creates a temporary difference. |
Deferred tax recognition | Deferred tax may not be recognized for all timing differences. | A Deferred Tax Liability (DTL) or Deferred Tax Asset (DTA) is recognized depending on whether the temporary difference is taxable or deductible. |
Subsequent periods | Treatment follows local regulations as differences reverse. | Deferred tax balances are adjusted as temporary differences reverse over the asset's useful life. |
Overall effect | Simpler accounting focused on statutory compliance. | Provides a more complete reflection of the future tax consequences of current transactions, improving the comparability and accuracy of financial statements. |
19. Employee Benefits
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 19) |
Overall approach | Primarily focuses on statutory employee compensation and benefits required under Vietnamese labor and social insurance regulations. | Provides a comprehensive framework for accounting for all forms of employee benefits throughout the employee's service period and after employment ends. |
Scope of employee benefits | Mainly covers salaries, wages, social insurance contributions, bonuses, and other statutory employee benefits. | Covers short-term employee benefits, post-employment benefits, other long-term employee benefits, termination benefits, and share-based compensation (the latter under IFRS 2). |
Short-term employee benefits | Includes salaries, wages, overtime, bonuses, and employer contributions to mandatory social insurance schemes. | Includes salaries, wages, paid annual leave, profit-sharing, bonuses, non-monetary benefits, and other benefits expected to be settled within 12 months. |
Post-employment benefits | Limited guidance beyond statutory retirement and social insurance obligations. | Includes defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans, with detailed accounting requirements for each. |
Defined contribution plans | Employer contributions are generally recognized as expenses when incurred. | Contributions are recognized as expenses in the period in which employees render services. |
Defined benefit plans | Limited or no comprehensive guidance. | Requires recognition of defined benefit obligations using actuarial valuation techniques. |
Actuarial valuation | Generally not required. | Required to measure defined benefit obligations using actuarial assumptions such as discount rates, salary growth, employee turnover, mortality, and retirement age. |
Long-service benefits | Limited guidance. | Includes long-service awards, long-term disability benefits, jubilee awards, and other long-term employee benefits measured using actuarial techniques where applicable. |
Termination benefits | Recognized in accordance with Vietnamese labor regulations. | Recognized when the entity can no longer withdraw the offer of termination benefits or when restructuring costs are recognized under IAS 37. |
Professional judgment | Relatively limited due to standardized statutory requirements. | Significant professional judgment is required in estimating actuarial assumptions, discount rates, future salary increases, employee turnover, and life expectancy. |
Disclosure requirements | Standard disclosures relating to employee compensation and statutory obligations. | Extensive disclosures regarding defined benefit obligations, plan assets, actuarial assumptions, sensitivity analyses, pension expenses, and risks associated with employee benefit plans. |
Practical Example: Employee Pension Plan
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IAS 19) |
Employee benefit arrangement | Company contributes to Vietnam's mandatory social insurance and retirement schemes. | Company provides both a mandatory retirement plan and an additional defined benefit pension plan. |
Recognition of expense | Employer contributions are recognized as employee benefit expenses when incurred. | Contributions to defined contribution plans are expensed as incurred, while defined benefit obligations are measured and recognized based on actuarial valuations. |
Defined benefit obligation | Generally not recognized beyond statutory obligations. | A pension liability (or asset) is recognized based on the present value of future pension obligations less the fair value of plan assets. |
Actuarial gains and losses | No specific accounting treatment. | Remeasurements arising from actuarial gains and losses are recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) and are not subsequently reclassified to profit or loss. |
Overall effect | Simpler accounting focused on statutory employment obligations. | Provides a more comprehensive reflection of the company's long-term obligations to employees, particularly for pension and retirement benefit plans. |
20. Share-Based Payments
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IFRS 2) |
Overall approach | Very limited guidance on accounting for share-based payment transactions. | Provides a comprehensive framework for accounting for all share-based payment arrangements. |
Scope | No detailed accounting requirements for equity-settled or cash-settled share-based payments. | Applies to equity-settled, cash-settled, and share-based payment transactions with cash alternatives. |
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) | Limited guidance on recognition and measurement. | ESOP transactions must be recognized as employee compensation expense over the vesting period. |
Stock options | No comprehensive accounting model. | Stock options granted to employees are recognized at the grant-date fair value and expensed over the vesting period. |
Restricted shares (Restricted Stock Awards) | Limited guidance. | Restricted shares are recognized based on their grant-date fair value and recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period. |
Measurement basis | Generally follows statutory accounting guidance where applicable. | Equity-settled share-based payments are measured at the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments granted. Cash-settled awards are measured at fair value and remeasured at each reporting date until settlement. |
Valuation methods | No prescribed valuation methodology. | Fair value is commonly determined using option pricing models such as Black-Scholes, Binomial, or Monte Carlo models, depending on the award's characteristics. |
Recognition of expense | Limited or no explicit requirement to recognize compensation expense over the vesting period. | Compensation expense is recognized systematically over the vesting period, with a corresponding increase in equity (for equity-settled awards) or liability (for cash-settled awards). |
Vesting conditions | Limited guidance. | Both service conditions and performance conditions are considered when recognizing compensation expense. |
Forfeitures | Limited guidance. | Entities estimate expected forfeitures (or account for actual forfeitures, depending on the applicable policy) when recognizing compensation expense. |
Professional judgment | Relatively limited. | Significant judgment is required in estimating fair value, expected volatility, expected term, dividend yield, risk-free interest rate, and employee forfeiture rates. |
Disclosure requirements | Basic disclosures, if any, depending on local regulations. | Extensive disclosures regarding the nature of share-based payment arrangements, valuation assumptions, fair value methodology, expense recognized, vesting conditions, and movements in outstanding awards. |
Practical Example: Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP)
Scenario | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS (IFRS 2) |
Transaction | Company grants stock options to employees as part of its compensation package. | Same transaction. |
Initial recognition | Limited accounting guidance; treatment may vary depending on local regulations. | The grant-date fair value of the stock options is determined using an appropriate option pricing model. |
Expense recognition | Compensation expense may not be systematically recognized over the vesting period. | The grant-date fair value is recognized as employee compensation expense over the vesting period, with a corresponding increase in equity. |
Measurement | No standardized valuation model is prescribed. | Fair value is typically calculated using models such as Black-Scholes or Binomial, incorporating assumptions about volatility, expected life, dividends, and risk-free interest rates. |
Financial statement impact | Limited impact on reported employee compensation and equity. | Employee compensation expense increases over the vesting period, while shareholders' equity increases, providing a more faithful representation of the economic cost of equity-based compensation. |
21. Disclosure Requirements
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS |
Overall disclosure philosophy | Disclosure requirements are relatively concise and primarily designed to satisfy statutory and regulatory reporting requirements. | Disclosure requirements are extensive and designed to provide transparent, decision-useful information for investors, creditors, and other stakeholders. |
Level of detail | Moderate level of disclosure with standardized reporting formats. | Highly detailed disclosures tailored to the entity's transactions, risks, and financial position. |
Primary objective | Compliance with Vietnamese accounting regulations and legal reporting obligations. | Enhance transparency, comparability, and users' understanding of the entity's financial performance, position, and risks. |
Accounting policies | Disclosure of significant accounting policies is required but generally follows standardized guidance. | Comprehensive disclosure of significant accounting policies, including entity-specific judgments and policy choices. |
Management judgments | Limited disclosure requirements. | Requires disclosure of significant judgments made by management in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the financial statements. |
Accounting estimates | Basic disclosure of significant estimates where applicable. | Extensive disclosure of key sources of estimation uncertainty, assumptions, and potential impacts on future financial statements. |
Risk management | Limited disclosure requirements. | Comprehensive disclosures on financial risk management objectives, policies, and procedures. |
Sensitivity analysis | Generally not required. | Required for certain financial risks (e.g., interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, market risk) to demonstrate how changes in assumptions affect financial performance and position. |
Fair value hierarchy | No formal disclosure requirement for fair value hierarchy. | Requires disclosure of Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 fair value measurements, including valuation techniques and significant inputs under IFRS 13. |
Capital management | Limited disclosure. | Requires disclosure of capital management objectives, policies, and compliance with externally imposed capital requirements. |
Liquidity risk | Basic disclosures where applicable. | Detailed maturity analyses of financial liabilities and disclosures regarding liquidity risk management. |
Market risk | Limited disclosure requirements. | Comprehensive disclosures covering interest rate risk, foreign currency risk, commodity price risk, and other market risks. |
Credit risk | Basic disclosures regarding receivables and provisions. | Extensive disclosures regarding credit risk exposures, expected credit losses (ECL), collateral, credit quality, and concentration of risk under IFRS 7 and IFRS 9. |
Professional judgment | Limited reliance on management judgment in preparing disclosures. | Significant professional judgment is required to determine material information, entity-specific risks, and meaningful disclosures. |
Overall transparency | Focused primarily on regulatory compliance. | Provides significantly greater transparency into the entity's financial position, performance, risks, estimates, and management decisions, supporting informed decision-making by investors and other users. |
22. Professional Judgment
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS |
Overall approach | More rules-based, with detailed regulatory guidance and prescribed accounting treatments. | Principle-based, requiring significant professional judgment in applying accounting standards. |
Role of professional judgment | Limited. Accountants primarily follow prescribed rules and standardized reporting requirements. | Fundamental to financial reporting. Management must exercise judgment to ensure financial statements faithfully represent the economic substance of transactions. |
Interpretation flexibility | Less room for interpretation, resulting in greater consistency but reduced flexibility. | Greater flexibility allows entities to apply accounting treatments that best reflect the underlying economics of transactions. |
Focus of assessment | Emphasis on compliance with statutory accounting regulations. | Emphasis on the economic substance of transactions rather than merely their legal form. |
Key areas requiring judgment | Generally limited to situations specifically addressed by Vietnamese accounting regulations. | Professional judgment is commonly required when assessing: • Control (IFRS 10) • Substance over form • Materiality (IAS 1) • Significant accounting estimates and assumptions • Fair value measurement • Impairment testing • Revenue recognition • Lease classification and measurement |
Management responsibility | Primarily responsible for ensuring compliance with statutory reporting requirements. | Responsible for selecting appropriate accounting policies, making reasonable judgments and estimates, and providing transparent disclosures about those judgments. |
Disclosure of judgments | Limited disclosure requirements regarding significant judgments. | Requires disclosure of significant judgments and key estimation uncertainties that could materially affect the financial statements. |
Overall impact | Produces standardized and consistent financial reporting with relatively limited management discretion. | Produces financial statements that more accurately reflect the economic reality of transactions but requires greater expertise, documentation, and auditor scrutiny. |
23. Digital Reporting
Aspect | Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC | IFRS |
Overall approach | Focuses on standardized statutory reporting formats required by Vietnamese regulatory authorities. | Focuses on digital, investor-oriented financial reporting with increasing adoption of international reporting technologies and sustainability disclosures. |
Primary objective | Facilitate regulatory compliance, tax administration, and government oversight. | Improve transparency, comparability, accessibility, and usability of financial information for global investors and stakeholders. |
Reporting format | Standardized financial statement templates prescribed by Vietnamese regulations. | Flexible reporting formats supported by internationally recognized digital reporting standards. |
Digital reporting standards | Primarily follows domestic electronic reporting requirements. | Increasing adoption of XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) for digital financial reporting in many jurisdictions. |
Annual reporting | Primarily focuses on statutory financial statements submitted to regulatory authorities. | Encourages comprehensive digital annual reports that integrate financial and non-financial information for investors. |
ESG integration | Limited requirements for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures. | Increasing integration of ESG and sustainability-related disclosures alongside financial reporting. |
Sustainability reporting | Sustainability reporting is generally outside the scope of Circular 99. | Increasing adoption of sustainability reporting frameworks, including the ISSB (International Sustainability Standards Board) standards (IFRS S1 and IFRS S2), to complement IFRS financial statements. |
Technology adoption | Designed primarily to support statutory electronic submissions to Vietnamese authorities. | Supports digital reporting ecosystems that enable automated data extraction, analytics, regulatory filing, and cross-border comparability. |
Global comparability | Primarily intended for domestic regulatory reporting. | Designed to facilitate global comparability and interoperability of financial information across capital markets. |
Future direction | Continued enhancement of electronic statutory reporting and regulatory compliance. | Ongoing expansion of digital reporting, machine-readable financial statements, ESG reporting, and sustainability disclosures to meet evolving investor and regulatory expectations. |
24. Transition Challenges
Transition Area | Challenge When Moving from Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC to IFRS | Potential Impact |
Revenue Recognition | IFRS 15 requires identification of performance obligations, allocation of transaction prices, and recognition based on the transfer of control rather than invoicing or legal completion. | Changes in the timing of revenue recognition, contract accounting, and financial performance reporting. |
Lease Accounting | IFRS 16 requires most leases to be recognized on the balance sheet as Right-of-Use (ROU) Assets and Lease Liabilities. | Increased reported assets and liabilities, changes to EBITDA, leverage ratios, and key financial metrics. |
Financial Instrument Valuation | IFRS 9 introduces classification based on business models and cash flow characteristics, along with fair value measurement for many financial assets. | Additional valuation processes, greater volatility in reported earnings, and more complex accounting. |
Fair Value Measurement | IFRS requires fair value measurement for many assets and liabilities, supported by IFRS 13 valuation principles and hierarchy. | Need for valuation specialists, market data, and robust valuation methodologies. |
Deferred Tax Calculations | IAS 12 requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for most temporary differences. | More complex tax accounting and additional reconciliation between accounting and tax records. |
Component Depreciation | IAS 16 requires significant components of an asset with different useful lives to be depreciated separately. | More detailed fixed asset registers, depreciation calculations, and asset management processes. |
Disclosure Requirements | IFRS requires substantially more detailed disclosures, including judgments, estimates, financial risks, fair value information, and sensitivity analyses. | Longer financial statements, increased reporting workload, and greater transparency for investors. |
Internal Control Enhancements | Existing internal controls may not adequately support IFRS recognition, measurement, valuation, and disclosure requirements. | Need to redesign accounting policies, review controls, and strengthen governance processes. |
ERP System Modifications | Existing accounting and ERP systems may not capture all data required for IFRS reporting, such as lease data, fair value information, and Expected Credit Loss (ECL) calculations. | System upgrades, process redesign, additional automation, and potential implementation costs. |
Staff Training and Competency | Finance teams, management, auditors, and operational departments must understand IFRS concepts and their practical application. | Investment in IFRS training, recruitment of experienced professionals, and continuous knowledge development. |
Summary of Key Transition Challenges
Category | Typical Actions Required |
Accounting Policies | Develop IFRS-compliant accounting policies and perform gap analysis against Circular 99. |
Financial Reporting | Redesign financial statement formats, disclosures, and reporting processes. |
Systems & Technology | Upgrade ERP systems, chart of accounts, reporting tools, and data collection processes. |
Internal Controls | Strengthen governance, documentation, and internal control procedures to support IFRS reporting. |
Tax & Compliance | Assess the impact on deferred taxes, tax reconciliations, and statutory reporting requirements. |
People & Training | Train finance teams, management, auditors, and business units on IFRS requirements and implementation. |
Project Management | Establish an IFRS implementation roadmap with timelines, milestones, governance, and cross-functional coordination. |
External Support | Engage external advisors, auditors, valuation specialists, and IT consultants where specialized expertise is required. |
25. Practical Example
A manufacturing company signs a five-year equipment service contract.
Under Circular 99
Revenue recognized according to invoicing schedule.
Lease treated as operating lease.
Receivables impaired only after evidence of default.
Equipment measured at historical cost.
Under IFRS
Revenue allocated across multiple performance obligations.
Lease recognized as:
Right-of-use asset
Lease liability
Expected credit losses recognized immediately.
Equipment impairment tested annually if indicators exist.
Fair value disclosures expanded significantly.
26. Summary Comparison
Area | Circular 99 | IFRS |
Accounting philosophy | Rule-based | Principle-based |
Financial statement format | Standardized | Flexible |
Fair value | Limited | Extensive |
Revenue | Invoice/contract focus | Transfer of control |
Financial instruments | Basic | Comprehensive |
Lease accounting | Operating vs Finance | Right-of-use model |
Consolidation | Ownership emphasis | Control model |
Deferred tax | Simplified | Comprehensive |
Professional judgment | Limited | Extensive |
Disclosure | Moderate | Highly detailed |
Investor focus | Lower | High |
Global comparability | Limited | Excellent |
Advantages of Circular 99
Easier compliance for domestic businesses
Standardized reporting formats
Lower implementation costs
Familiar to Vietnamese accountants
Well aligned with statutory reporting and tax administration
Advantages of IFRS
Higher-quality financial reporting
Better reflects economic substance
Greater transparency for investors
Enhanced comparability across jurisdictions
Facilitates access to international capital markets
Supports cross-border mergers, acquisitions, and listings
Which Framework Should a Company Use?
The appropriate framework depends on the company's objectives:
Company Type | Recommended Framework |
Small domestic enterprise | Circular 99 is generally sufficient for statutory reporting. |
Large Vietnamese corporation | Circular 99 for compliance, with consideration of IFRS for strategic reporting. |
Foreign-invested enterprise (FDI) | Circular 99 for statutory filings and IFRS for group reporting, if required by the parent company. |
Listed company | Circular 99 for local requirements, with IFRS increasingly beneficial as Vietnam's IFRS adoption progresses. |
Multinational corporation | IFRS is generally preferred for consistency across jurisdictions. |
Company preparing for an IPO or international fundraising | IFRS is strongly recommended to meet investor expectations and improve comparability. |
Conclusion
Circular 99/2025/TT-BTC is an important step in modernizing Vietnam's financial reporting framework, improving consistency, transparency, and alignment with international practices. However, it remains primarily a statutory reporting framework designed to satisfy domestic legal and regulatory requirements.
IFRS, by contrast, is a globally recognized, principles-based framework focused on faithfully representing the economic substance of transactions and providing decision-useful information to investors and other capital market participants. It incorporates advanced concepts such as fair value measurement, expected credit losses, right-of-use accounting for leases, comprehensive consolidation principles, and extensive disclosure requirements.
For Vietnamese enterprises seeking international investment, cross-border financing, mergers and acquisitions, or public listings, understanding—and ultimately adopting—IFRS can provide a significant strategic advantage. As Vietnam continues its roadmap toward greater IFRS adoption, organizations that invest early in systems, processes, governance, and professional training will be better positioned to compete in an increasingly global business environment.
Resources : Internet



Comments